NORTHERN EUROPE IN THE RAW MATERIALS SEGMENT OF CRITICAL PRODUCTION CHAINS
- 作者: Vasilchenko A.D.1
-
隶属关系:
- Institute of Europe of the RAS
- 期: 编号 5 (133) (2025)
- 页面: 106-119
- 栏目: PROBLEMS OF ECONOMY
- URL: https://clinpractice.ru/0201-7083/article/view/695690
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0201708325050092
- ID: 695690
如何引用文章
详细
This article explores the position held by Northern European countries in the strategic sectors of European economy under the new emerging technological order. The hypothesis is tested that over the past ten years Scandinavian countries have been able to strengthen their positions in the segment of strategic raw materials (primarily copper and nickel) of critical production chains. The methodology is based on a quantitative assessment of inter-country trade linkages in separate stages of production chains, namely, raw materials, intermediate goods, and final products. The author proposes a method for identifying critical production chains based on a new coefficient of import dependence, which assesses the degree of a country's orientation toward importing a certain product from a certain partner country. The countries studied included Norway, Finland, and Sweden. The time period is limited to 2014–2024. The list of strategic technologies includes traction motors, wind turbines, heat pumps, and 3D-printers working on metals. The research demonstrates that Northern European countries are involved in five critical production chains in the raw-materials segment, three of which originate in Finland. In 2014 there were only two critical chains; in the newest 3D-printers sector they were absent. The results verify the validity of the research hypothesis, highlighting the increasingly significant positions of Scandinavian economies in strategically important sectors of the European economy. The main positions in critical production chains in the region are occupied by Western European countries, particularly Germany. A trend towards limited dependence on strategic resources and the heavier utilization of alternative composite materials among large final producers is shown. At the same time, the EU puts an emphasis on strategic projects related to raw materials in Northern Europe. A surge is anticipated in the demand for copper and nickel, two most extensively utilized metals in strategic technologies. Both of these trends lead to a conclusion that the economies under consideration will maintain their status in the raw material segment of critical production chains. However, this will not contradict the flagship state policies aimed at increasing economic complexity.
作者简介
Alexander Vasilchenko
Institute of Europe of the RAS
Email: vasilchenko@instituteofeurope.ru
Junior researcher Moscow, Russia
参考
- Baba, C. et al. (2023). Geoeconomic Fragmentation: What's at Stake for the EU. IMF Working Paper 23/245, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
- Baldwin, R., Freeman, R., Theodorakopoulos, A. (2023). Hidden exposure: Measuring US supply chain reliance. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2023(2), pp. 79–167.
- Bauer, M., du Roy, O., Sharma, V. (2023). A forward-thinking approach to open strategic autonomy: Navigating EU trade dependencies and risk mitigation (No. 13/2023). ECIPE Policy Brief.
- Blengini, G. A. et al. (2017). Methodology for establishing the EU list of critical raw materialsGuidelines (Vol. 1, pp. 1–165). European Union.
- Bobba, S. et al. (2020). European Commission, Critical materials for strategic technologies and sectors in the EU – a foresight study. Publications Office of the European Union, 2020. 100 p. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/42881; doi: 10.2873/58081.
- Carrara, S. et al. (2023). Supply chain analysis and material demand forecast in strategic technologies and sectors in the EU – A foresight study, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2023, doi: 10.2760/386650, JRC132889.
- Commission Decision of 25.3.2025 recognizing certain critical raw material projects as Strategic Projects under Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council | European Commission, Brussels, 25.3.2025. URL: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/circabc-ewpp/d/d/workspace/SpacesStore/1958718b-21e9-40f4-9c9f-42a58dc4c5a3/file.bin
- Disen, G. (2023). Geoekonomicheskaya moshch' Evropy: rascvet i upadok Evrosoyuza [Geoeconomic Power Europe: The Rise and Decline of the European Union]. Contemporary World Economy, 1(1), pp. 33–51. doi: 10.31857/S0201708325020159 (In Russian).
- Eilu, P. et al. (2021). The Nordic supply potential of critical metals and minerals for a Green Energy Transition. Nordic Innovation Report. ISBN 978-82-8277-115-3 (digital publication), ISBN 978-82-8277-114-6 (printed).
- Global Wind Report 2025. Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), April 2025. URL: https://www.gwec.net/events/2025-global-wind-report-launch.
- Jonsson E. et al. (2023). Critical metals and minerals in the Nordic countries of Europe: diversity of mineralization and green energy potential.
- Koese, M., Parzer, M., Sprecher, B., & Kleijn, R. (2025). Self-sufficiency of the European Union in critical raw materials for E-mobility. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 212.
- Konivalova, E. (2025). Doklad Mario Dragi cherez prizmu kriticheskoj geopolitiki [Mario Draghi’s Report Through the Lens of Critical Geopolitics]. Contemporary Europe, 1, pp. 175–183. doi: 10.31857/S0201708325020159 (In Russian).
- Lyons, L. et al. (2023). Clean Energy Technology Observatory: Heat pumps in the European Union ‒ 2023 Status Report on Technology Development, Trends, Value Chains and Markets, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2023, doi: 10.2760/69478, JRC134991
- Majune and V. Stolzenburg (2022). Mapping Potential Bottleneck Products in the World. Paper prepared for the Global Value Chain Development Report 2023 workshop. Geneva. 7–11 November.
- Medvedkov, V. et al. (2024). Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyuciya, konkurentosposobnost' Evropejskogo soyuza i budushchee mezhdunarodnoj torgovli [The Forth Industrial Revolution, European Union competitiveness and future of international trade]. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 40(2), pp. 191–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2024.203 (In Russian).
- Petelin, E. (2025). Effects of resource security concerns on Nordic countries' approach to the circular economy of metals. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 55, pp. 420–433.
- Righetti, E., & Rizos, V. (2023). The EU’s quest for strategic raw materials: what role for mining and recycling. Intereconomics, 58(2), pp. 69–73.
- Technology and Market Overview of the Electric-Motor Value Chain. CWIEME Berlin and S&P Global Mobility, November 2024. URL: https://berlin.cwiemeevents.com/home.
- Tolkachev, S., Teplyakov, A. (2023). Evropejskaya obrabatyvayushchaya promyshlennost' v global'nyh cepochkah stoimosti: usilenie integracii i podryv konkurentosposobnosti [European Manufacturing in Global Value Chains]. Russia and the Contemporary World, 4(121), pp. 83–101. doi: 10.31249/rsm/2023.04.05. (In Russian).
- Watson, S. et al. (2019). Future emerging technologies in the wind power sector: A European perspective. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 113.
- Wind Energy in Europe – 2024 Statistics and the outlook for 2025‒2030. Wind Europe, February 2024. URL: https://windeurope.org/intelligence-platform/product/wind-energy-in-europe-2024statistics-and-the-outlook-for-2025-2030/.
补充文件



