Socio-psychological factors of the integration potential of the host society and its attitude to migrants

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The purpose of the work is a theoretical analysis of the problem of socio-psychological factors of the integration potential of the host society and its attitude towards migrants. Currently, large-scale migration processes are taking place in society, which have a significant impact on various spheres of social relations. The process of creating conditions for the inclusion of migrants in Russian society is possible based on the analysis of socio-psychological factors of its integration potential. The concept of the “integration potential of the host society” is clarified as a set of resources and conditions available in a particular society aimed at the interaction of migrants and representatives of the host population, contributing to the process of adaptation of migrants, as a result of which, based on common goals and interests, optimal connections are established between them and social groups necessary for the formation of society as a systemic integrity. The factors of the integration potential of the host society are identified, including acculturation expectations, a basic sense of security, positive ethnic identity, ethnic tolerance, and the implementation of a multiculturalism strategy.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. V. Konstantinov

Penza State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: konstantinov_vse@mail.ru

Sc.D. (psychology), Professor, Head of the Department of General Psychology

Russian Federation, 440026, Penza, Krasnaya str., 40

Yu. S. Buzykina

Penza State University

Email: ylamart@yandex.ru

PhD (psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Applied Psychology

Russian Federation, 440026, Penza, Krasnaya str., 40

R. V. Osin

Penza State University

Email: osin@pnzgu.ru

PhD (psychology), Associate Professorof the Department General Psychology

Russian Federation, 440026, Penza, Krasnaya str., 40

N. N. Khashchenko

Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nadin-khash@yandex.ru

PhD (psychology), researcher at the Laboratory of Social and Economic Psychology

Russian Federation, 129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, bldn. 1

References

  1. Arutjunova E.M., Kuznecov I.M. Integracionnyj potencial prinimajushhego obshhestva: sravnitel’naja regional’naja perspektiva. Mir Rossii. 2021. V. 30. № 2. P. 6–25. doi: 10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-2-6-25. (In Russian)
  2. Voloh V.A. Novaja Rossija: politika i upravlenie migracionnymi processami: monografija. Samara: Izd-vo “Bahran-M”, 2015. 160 p. (In Russian)
  3. Gerasimova I.V. Processy adaptacii i integracii migrantov kak komponenty obespechenija nacional’noj bezopasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii. Nauka. Obshhestvo. Oborona. Moscow. 2019. V. 7. № 4. doi: 10.24411/2311-1763-2019-10211. (In Russian)
  4. Demograficheskij prognoz RF do konca 2045 goda. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL:https://www.interfax.ru/russia/939473 (date of request: 06.04.2024). (In Russian)
  5. Dmitrieva T.N. Realizacija politiki adaptacii i integracii migrantov v Rossijskoj Federacii kak faktor razvitija institutov grazhdanskogo obshhestva: diss … PhD (political). Moscow, 2019. 167 p. (In Russian)
  6. Drobizheva L.M. Grazhdanskaja identichnost’ kak uslovie oslablenija jetnicheskogo negativizma. Mir Rossii. 2017. V. 26. № 1. P. 7–31. (In Russian)
  7. Kapica L.M. Migracionnyj cunami v Evropejskom sojuze. Portal MGIMO. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: https://mgimo.ru/about/news/experts/migratsionnyy-tsunami-v-nbspevropeyskom-soyuze/ (date of request: 03.04.2024) (In Russian)
  8. Konstantinova L.V. Integracionnyj potencial obshhestva: opyt konceptualizacii. Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2019. № 8. P. 19–29. (In Russian)
  9. Kotova M.V. Social’no-psihologicheskie faktory prinjatija politiki mul’tikul’turalizma v Rossii: analiticheskij obzor. Kul’turno-istoricheskaja psihologija. 2017. V. 13. № 4. P. 91–100. (In Russian)
  10. Lebedeva N.M. Teoreticheskie podhody k issledovaniju vzaimnyh ustanovok i strategij mezhkul’turnogo vzaimodejstvija migrantov i naselenija Rossii: v kn. Strategii mezhkul’turnogo vzaimodejstvija migrantov i naselenija Rossii: sb. nauchnyh statej. Moscow: RUDN, 2009. P. 10–62. (In Russian)
  11. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N., Berri J. Social’no-psihologicheskie osnovy mul’tikul’turalizma: proverka gipotez o mezhkul’turnom vzaimodejstvii v rossijskom kontekste. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2016. V. 37. № 2. P. 92–104. (In Russian)
  12. Ledeneva V.Ju. Formy i modeli social’noj adaptacii i integracii migrantov. Politika i obshhestvo. 2015. № 6(126). P. 717–728. (In Russian)
  13. Lichnostnyj potencial: struktura i diagnostika. Eds. D.A. Leont’eva. Moscow: Smysl, 2011. 680 p. (In Russian)
  14. Lepshokova Z.H. Vzaimnaja akkul’turacija migrantov i prinimajushhego naselenija: modeli, metodiki, kljuchevye issledovanija i vyzovy. Social’naja psihologija i obshhestvo. 2022. V. 13. № 2. C. 55–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130205 (In Russian)
  15. Lepshokova Z.H. Strategii adaptacii migrantov i ih psihologicheskoe blagopoluchie (na primere Moskvy i Severnogo Kavkaza): monografija. Moscow: Grifon, 2012. 192 p. (In Russian)
  16. Lepshokova Z.H., Tatarko A.N. Adaptacija i modifikacija metodiki akkul’turacionnyh ozhidanij John Berry. Social’naja psihologija i obshhestvo. 2017. V. 8. № 3. P. 125–146. (In Russian)
  17. Marshak A.L., Guzenina S.V. Sociokul’turnye praktiki adaptacii immigrantov: k voprosu ob integracionnom potenciale prinimajushhego obshhestva. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. 2019. № 4. P. 139–153. doi: 10.19181/snsp.2019.7.4.6807. (In Russian)
  18. Ocenka chislennosti postojannogo naselenija na 1 janvarja 2024 g. i v srednem za 2023 g. i komponenty ee izmenenija. Oficial’nyj sajt Rosstata. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/OkPopul_Comp2024_Site.xlsx (date of request: 06.04.2024) (In Russian)
  19. Parvadov S.O. Svjaz’ sub’ektivnoj religioznosti s antiimmigrantskimi ustanovkami v Evrope: analiz na osnove dannyh Evropejskogo social’nogo issledovanija (ESS). Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: jekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny. 2024. № 2. P. 78–95. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.2.2439 (In Russian)
  20. Putin V.V. Rossija: nacional’nyj vopros. Nezavisimaja gazeta. 23.01.2012 [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: http://www.ng.ru/politics/2012-01-23/1_national.html (date of request: 04.04.2024) (In Russian)
  21. Soldatova G.U. Psihologija mezhjetnicheskoj naprjazhennosti. Moscow: Smysl. 1998. 389 p. (In Russian)
  22. Somova I.Ju. Kul’turno-religioznaja adaptacija i integracija migrantov — musul’man v Evropejskom sojuze. Mir nauki. Sociologija, filologija, kul’turologija. 2022. V. 13. № 1. URL: https://sfk-mn.ru/PDF/19KLSK122.pdf (In Russian)
  23. Social’no-jekonomicheskoe polozhenie Rossii v janvare-fevrale 2024 g. Oficial’nyj sajt Rosstata. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/osn-02-2024.pdf (date of request: 06.04.2024) (In Russian)
  24. Tatarko A.N. Rol’ vosprinimaemoj ugrozy v otnoshenii moskvichej k migrantam: v kn. Strategii mezhkul’turnogo vzaimodejstvija migrantov i naselenija Rossii: sb. nauchnyh statej. Moscow: RUDN, 2009. P. 140–164. (In Russian)
  25. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 19.12.2012 № 1666 “O Strategii gosudarstvennoj nacional’noj politiki Rossijskoj Federacii na period do 2025 goda” [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_139350/ (date of request: 01.04.2024) (In Russian)
  26. Hotinec V.Ju., Molchanova E.A. Oposredujushhaja rol’ jetnicheskogo obraza v mezhjetnicheskih otnoshenijah. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2014. V. 35. № 3. P. 40–57. (In Russian)
  27. Shergalieva M.T. Jetnicheskaja identichnost’ kak vid social’noj identichnosti. Vestnik SGTU. 2014. № 3(76). P. 207–211. (In Russian)
  28. Berry J.W. Immigration, Acculturation and Adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 1997. V. 46(1). P. 5–68.
  29. Berry J.W. Contexts of Acculturation. Immigrant Youth in Cultural Transition Mahwah. Eds. J.W. Berry, L.S. Phinney, D.L. Sam, P. Vedder. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006. P. 27–42.
  30. Bond M. Chinese values and health: A cross-cultural examination. Psychology and health. 1991. № 5. P. 137–152.
  31. Bourhis R.Y., Moпse L.C., Perreault S., Senecal S. Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology. 1997. V. 32(6). P. 369–386.
  32. Cliteur P.B. De filosofie van mensenrechten. Nijmegen, 1999.
  33. Hainmueller J., Hiscox M.J. Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe. International Organization. 2007. № 61(2). P. 399–442. doi: 10.1017/S0020818307070142
  34. Huntington Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996
  35. Navas M., Rojas A.J., García M., Pumares P. Acculturation strategies and attitudes according to the Relative Acculturation Extended Model (RAEM): The perspectives of natives versus immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2007. V. 31. P. 67–86.
  36. Moghaddam F. Managing cultural diversity: North American experiences and suggestions for the German unification process. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1993. V. 28. P. 727–741.
  37. Moghaddam F., Taylor D. The meaning of multiculturalism for visible minority immigrant women. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science. 1987. V. 19. Р. 121–136.
  38. Putnam R.D. E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty‐first Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2007. № 30(2). P. 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
  39. Rudmin F.W. Critical history of the acculturation psychology of assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization. Review of General Psychology. 2003. V. 7. P. 3–37.
  40. Sagiv L., Schwartz S. Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995. V. 69. Р. 437–448.
  41. Stephan W.G., Stephan C.W. An integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice. Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Ed. S. Oscamp. Lawrence Erlbaum associates. Mahwah. New Jersey, 2000. P. 23–44.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences