Identification criteria for erga omnes obligations

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The judgement of ICJ of 1970 brought about the need for theoretical basis for erga omnes obligations in international legal science. The following state and ICJ practice failed to create any uniform solution for identification of these rules. Therefore, the international legal teachings became essential for developing individual criteria and approaches to separate erga omnes rules and other rules of International Law.

About the authors

Larisa V. Vereina

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia

Russian Federation, Moscow

Ivan Igorevich Sinyakin

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia

Russian Federation, Moscow

Aleksandra Yu. Skuratova

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Абашидзе А.Х. Участие государств в Статуте Международного Уголовного Суда – обязательство erga omnes // Международное право. 2007. № 1. С. 139 - 145.
  2. Краткое изложение решений, консультативных заключений и постановлений Международного Суда ООН (1948–1991). Нью-Йорк, 1993. С. 89.
  3. Леонов А.С., Споршев А.М. Противодействие международному терроризму как обязательство erga omnes // Вестник Нижегородского ун-та им. Н.И. Лобачевского. Право. 2018. № 2. С. 152, 153.
  4. Лукашук И.И. Современное право международных договоров: в 2 т. Т.1: Заключение международных договоров. М., 2004. С. 191, 280.
  5. Романов В.А. Исключение войны из жизни общества. М., 1961. С. 83.
  6. Сазонова К.Л. Обязательства erga omnes и нормы jus cogens в международном праве: концептуальное оформление и правоприменительная практика // Государство и право. 2014. № 11. С. 72 - 79.
  7. Черниченко С.В. Взаимосвязь императивных норм международного права (jus cogens) и обязательств erga omnes // Московский журнал междунар. права. 2012. № 3. С. 6.
  8. Arangio-Ruiz G. Fourth Report on State Responsibility Add. 1-3 // Yearbook of the ILC. 1992. Vol. II (Part One). P. 34.
  9. Bassiouni M.C. Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practice // Virginia Journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 42 (1). P. 88.
  10. Byers M. Conceptualising the relationship between jus cogens and erga omnes rules // Nordic Journal of International Law. 1997. Vol. 66. P. 233.
  11. Christianti D.W. The “Modern” Concept of Erga Omnes to Establish the Obligation of Impunity Eradication: Towards the Primacy Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court // Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 2018. Vol. 5 (2). P. 215.
  12. Christianti D.W. Why We Need Erga Omnes Character for Obligations to Combat Impunity for International Crimes // Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 2017. Vol. 4 (2). P. 365.
  13. Criddle E.J. Standing for Human Rights Abroad // Cornell Law Review. 2015. Vol. 100 (1). P. 288, 289.
  14. Palosaari Т. More than Just Wishful Thinking? Existence and Identification of Environmental Obligations Erga Omnes. University of Eastern Finland. 2018. P. 41, 53, 60 - 62.
  15. Ragazzi M. The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes. Oxford, 1997. P. 17, 132–134.
  16. Sicilianos L.-A. The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility // European Journal of International Law. 2002. Vol. 13. P. 1135.
  17. Tams C.J. Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law. Cambridge University Press. 2005. P. 4, 56, 57, 87, 88, 102, 109–114, 128–139, 157, 306, 307, 309, 310.
  18. Teraya K. Emerging Hierarchy in International Human Rights and Beyond: From the Perspective of Non-derogable Rights // European Journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 12. Issue 5. P. 934.
  19. The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication / ed. by C.P. Romano, K.J. Alter, Y. Shany. Oxford University Press, 2015. P. 466, 470–473, 480, 481, 775.
  20. Wet E. The International Constitutional Order // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 55. P. 62, 63, 69.
  21. Zemanek K. New Trends in the Enforcement of Erga Omnes Obligations // Max Plank UNYB. 2000. Vol. 4. P. 11, 12, 26, 27.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences